While conservation efforts at local level are important for livelihoods and wildlife, landscape level conservation approaches increase impacts across much larger areas by helping to secure wildlife movements, implement conservation measures, encourage socioeconomic development and manage human wildlife conflict.
Landscape level conservation is particularly important in Namibia. With the country mainly arid to semi-arid, wildlife requires a much larger area in which to migrate in response to rainfall patterns and to access grazing.
Community conservation continues to expand, increasing the number of people who benefit from natural resource use, as well as the area under conservation. Increased landscape connectivity created by new conservancies across Namibia is vital to ensuring environmental resilience and countering the impacts of climate change. These developments are major contributors to Namibia’s efforts to fulfil its constitutional commitment to safeguard the environment while at the same time achieving economic growth and rural development. CBNRM is recognised by the Namibian government as contributing to a range of national development goals, including several for the environment.
The expansion of structured natural resource management across Namibia
Namibia’s national protected area network covers 16.9% of the country with communal conservancies and community forests jointly covering an additional 22.2%. Together parks and community conservation areas greatly expand the area under sustainable land management, with a total of 40% of Namibia under some form of natural resource management. These two systems of land management can operate side-byside and be mutually beneficial. Community lands can secure wildlife corridors, linking national parks, while neighbouring communities can benefit from their association with parks through benefits like tourism concessions and better managed wildlife populations.
Both parks and conservancies were established with human goals (i.e. to conserve nature and/or generate income) and constraints in mind, which means that their boundaries frequently cut across natural ecosystems and animal migration routes. Ecosystem management therefore requires a larger landscape-scale approach that goes beyond park and conservancy boundaries. This includes fostering better working relationships among conservancies at regional and sub-regional levels and between conservancies and neighbouring national parks. Aligning conservancy land use zones with each other and using data on animal movements to identify wildlife corridors between parks are therefore priorities for landscape conservation in Namibia.
Coordinating conservation efforts is important at a national level, but also at an international level. Managing ecosystems across international boundaries is even more complex than within a particular country, as different governments need to cooperate and agree on certain key issues.
Namibia is engaged in landscape conservation at multiple levels – between individual conservancies, conservancies and parks, and conservancies, parks and neighbouring countries.
A landscape approach to conservation
Increased landscape connectivity created by the growth of conservancies across Namibia is vital to ensuring environmental resilience and countering the impacts of climate change, not only nationally but also across national borders. The creation of contiguous conservation areas and transboundary conservation areas provide for conservation at scale.
Wider benefits of conservation
These developments are major contributors to Namibia’s efforts to fulfil its constitutional commitment to safeguard the environment while at the same time achieving economic growth and rural development. CBNRM is recognised by the Namibian government as contributing to a range of national development goals, including several for the environment.
Community involvement
It is important to note that conservancy formation was and is driven by local communities, which have decided to protect wildlife as an economic option because they derive benefits from it through tourism and conservation hunting. The expansion of conservation areas has also led to the expansion of wildlife populations in state and community protected areas.
Community Forests
A | Bukalo |
B | Hans Kanyinga |
C | Kwandu |
D | Lubuta |
E | Masida |
F | Mbeyo |
G | Mkata |
H | Ncamagoro |
J | Ncaute |
K | Ncumcara |
L | Okongo |
M | Sikanjabuka |
N | Uukolonkadhi |
P | Cuma |
Q | Gcwatjinga |
R | George Mukoya |
S | Kahenge |
T | Katope |
U | Likwaterera |
V | Marienfluss |
W | Muduva Nyangana |
X | Nyae Nyae |
Y | Ohepi |
Z | Okondjombo |
Aa | Omufitu Wekuta |
Ab | Orupembe |
Ac | Oshaampula |
Ad | Otjiu-West |
Ae | Puros |
Af | Sachona |
Ag | Sanitatas |
Ah | Zilitene |
Ai | African Wild Dog |
Ak | Ehi-Rovipuka |
Al | Eiseb |
Am | N≠a Jaqna |
An | Omundaungilo |
Ao | Omuramba Ua Umbinda |
Ap | Ondjou |
Aq | Otjituuo |
Ar | Otjombinde |
As | Otshiku-ShiIthilonde |
At | Epukiro |
Au | Ambrosius Haingura |
Av | Aminuis |
Aw | Ozonahi |
Conservancies
1 | Nyae Nyae |
2 | Salambala |
3 | ≠Khoadi-//Hôas |
4 | Torra |
5 | Wuparo |
6 | Doro !nawas |
7 | Uibasen Twyfelfontein |
8 | Kwandu |
9 | Mayuni |
10 | Puros |
11 | Marienfluss |
12 | Tsiseb |
13 | Ehi-Rovipuka |
14 | Oskop |
15 | Sorris Sorris |
16 | Mashi |
17 | Omatendeka |
18 | Otjimboyo |
19 | Uukwaluudhi |
20 | Orupembe |
21 | Okangundumba |
22 | //Huab |
23 | !Khob !naub |
24 | //Gamaseb |
25 | Anabeb |
26 | Sesfontein |
27 | Sanitatas |
28 | Ozondundu |
29 | N≠a Jaqna |
30 | ≠Gaingu |
31 | Joseph Mbambangandu |
32 | Uukolonkadhi Ruacana |
33 | Ozonahi |
34 | Shamungwa |
35 | Sheya Shuushona |
36 | !Gawachab |
37 | Muduva Nyangana |
38 | Otjituuo |
39 | African Wild Dog |
40 | King Nehale |
41 | George Mukoya |
42 | Okamatapati |
43 | Kasika |
44 | Impalila |
45 | Balyerwa |
46 | Ondjou |
47 | Kunene River |
48 | Ohungu |
49 | Sobbe |
50 | //Audi |
51 | Ovitoto |
52 | !Han /Awab |
53 | Okondjombo |
54 | Otjambangu |
55 | Eiseb |
56 | Sikunga |
57 | Okongo |
58 | Huibes |
59 | Dzoti |
60 | Otjitanda |
61 | Otjombinde |
62 | Orupupa |
63 | Omuramba ua Mbinda |
64 | Bamunu |
65 | !Khoro !goreb |
66 | Kabulabula |
67 | Okongoro |
68 | Otjombande |
69 | Ongongo |
70 | Ombujokanguindi |
71 | Otuzemba |
72 | Otjiu-West |
72 | Otjiu-West |
73 | Iipumbu ya Tshilongo |
74 | Okatjandja Kozomenje |
75 | Ombazu |
76 | Okanguati |
77 | Epupa |
78 | Otjikondavirongo |
79 | Etanga |
80 | Nakabolelwa |
81 | Ombombo |
82 | Lusese |
83 | Maurus Nekaro |
84 | Kapinga kaMwalye |
85 | Otjindjerese |
86 | Otjikongo |
6‑7 | Doro !nawas/Uibasen Twyfelfontein/Sorris Sorris Joint Management |
Associations
α | Kyaramacan Association |
ф | Topnaar Association |
New in 2021
Establishment of the ≠Aonin Association | Indigenous communities reside in some national parks in Namibia. This allows communities to maintain their cultural links to the land and its natural resources while being active participants in the conservation of these areas. As per the National Policy on Protected Areas’ Neighbours and Resident Communities, the MEFT assisted the Topnaar community that resides in the Namib Naukluft Park and Dorob National Park to form an association, which led to the creation and launch of the ≠Aonin (Topnaar) Community Association in December 2021. The Association has a committee elected by the community, which is the representative body dealing with tourism and natural resources matters and ensuring equitable benefit distribution. |
New Community Forests | The establishment of community forests aims to create joint responsibility between the government and communities to conserve forest resources, which are under threat from population pressure and poverty, the conversion of forests to cropland, and through harvesting of wood resources at unsustainable levels. In November 2021, the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism and the United Nations Development Programme jointly inaugurated new community forest and conservancy offices at Otjiu-West in the Kunene region, and in the Oshaampula Community Forest in the Oshikoto region. To date, 15 communities have received assistance from the Sustainable Management of Namibia’s Forested Lands (Namfola) project, a collaboration of the Namibian government and UNDP, with financial support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The Namfola project also assisted the Otjiu-West community with an assessment of marketable forest and non-forest tradable products and other income-generating options, which contribute to efforts in eradicating poverty and hunger. |